[Not many people today know about corrupt legacy and deceit history of NDTV Head Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy. How Prannoy Roy, his wife Radhika Roy of NDTV, palmed off Doordarshan in a way not dissimilar to how DB Realty palmed off Telecom Ministry and the tax payer. Tweeple and guest blogger Shri @s_chaitanya provides valuable insights that will help one understand deceit nature of major sections of Indian media today. Prannoy Roy's ascendency in broadcast media to a good extent explains why large sections of broadcast media show poor journalist standards. Prannoy Roy case is another example of determined rogues with connections conning Indians and escaping justice]
During 1997 and 1998, the names of NDTV and its founder Prannoy Roy appear in newspapers and magazines in relation to a major corruption case in Doordarshan.
In the context of the recent reports of financial malpractice by NDTV and its founder Prannoy Roy, I followed up on this tweet by Kunal Majumdar, a journalist:
Outlook, 1st September 1997: “Star Crossed | Star TV boss Rathikant Basu tries desperately to save his job as the CBI gets ready to file cases against him”
Outlook, 22nd Sep 1997: “How Zee Is Shooting Star: Lobbyists have a field day as Subhash Chandra guns for partner Murdoch’s expansion plans”
Indian Express, 9th July 1998: Mandarins’ Murdoch mission likely to end up in smoke
).
Progressively in Indian media, journalism of courage has by and large been buried. Prannoy James Roy, son of English Mother and Bengali father has done rather well by networking with the powerful and the corrupt. He is a member of the CFR. He is a co-brother of Prakash Karat, Marxist Communist Party, General Secretary who by the way is also a bible expert and who was guided by liberation theologian, Reverend Duncan Forester for scholarship to Edinburgh University(Wikipedia wont tell you this. ) Prannoy is Suzanne (aka Arundati) Roy's cousin. By and large and not surprisingly NDTV has been faithful to red and islamist networks whose agenda, NDTV champions. Discourse subversion by the likes of NDTV has high costs and is not understood by many. One shudders to think to what compromises, NDTV and the Roys would have done to sustain their almost perpetually loss-making entity. Continuous survival of a continually loss making NDTV is a financial miracle in itself that calls for scrutiny.
Further, success through corruption sets a very wrong example to the society. Its not a coincidence that Rajdeep Sardesai, Raghav Behl and others have sought to emulate Prannoy Roy Model of Corruption and Deceit journalism. It is said old habits die hard. NDTV was again in the news for corruption. Sunday Guardian highlighted how NDTV avoids Taxes and of financial chicanery with ICICI bank. NDTV decided to brazen it out and tried intimidating tactics with Sunday Guardian. And well, interview appearances, 'awards' for Chanda Kochchar, 'Life time Achievement' for KV Kamath and award to ICICI have nothing to do with quid pro quo?
Fredrick Hayek's rule on people violating ossified rules in India kind of scarcity environment has been proffered at times to justify corruption. That defence does not hold in cases similar to prannoy roy's CBI case where the goal is to defraud the tax-payer and criminal conspiracy is involved. It might be worthwhile for intrepid RTI -waalas to cull out facts on Prannoy Roy's CBI case. Dr. Swamy suggests innovative ways to prosecute the corrupt. These approaches are likely to work when the judiciary is fair. Judiciary, post KG Balakrishnan seems different and presents a window of opportunity to tame corruption such as NDTV's]
Related:
(Zoom Indian Media)
------------------------------------------------------ कोई भी मूल्य एवं संस्कृति तब तक जीवित नहीं रह सकती जब तक वह आचरण में नहीं है.
During 1997 and 1998, the names of NDTV and its founder Prannoy Roy appear in newspapers and magazines in relation to a major corruption case in Doordarshan.
In the context of the recent reports of financial malpractice by NDTV and its founder Prannoy Roy, I followed up on this tweet by Kunal Majumdar, a journalist:
In 1998 CBI had filed a case against Pranoy Roy for creating a loss of Rs 5 cr to DD http://bit.ly/ij5lC3 #fbI was surprised to learn of the existence of a CBI case against Prannoy Roy. I wanted to dig up more on this story. I went through all 16 pages returned by Google for “prannoy roy cbi dd” and found many interesting links. I’m putting the links here quoting revelant portions of the articles. One must be cautious before drawing conclusions from these articles as they were written more than a decade ago. But one conclusion that people may safely draw is that during the early 90s, NDTV and its founder and Executive Chairperson Prannoy Roy were allegedly involved in corrupt dealings reportedly causing a loss of atleast Rs. 3.52 crore to Doordarshan, allegedly bribed an official in the Government of India, and in January 1998 cases were filed against Roy and others by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) under Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for criminal conspiracy and under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Outlook, 1st September 1997: “Star Crossed | Star TV boss Rathikant Basu tries desperately to save his job as the CBI gets ready to file cases against him”
It’s not just Basu who is under the CBI searchlight. Agency records name NDTV CEO Prannoy Roy as a beneficiary and the CBI is currently firming its case against him. Says V. Lakshmi Ratan, additional secretary, DOPT: “The case will be against both the bribe-giver and taker. Roy will definitely be in the CBI dragnet if the agency finds evidence against Basu.” And the CBI’s blotter of charges—though not new—can be potentially very damaging.The original motivation for the CBI inquiry seems to be bureaucrat scrutiny at wrongdoing by Roy and Basu though sections of media appeared to project it differently.
At present, the agency is looking into two allegations: that in 1990, Basu as director general, Doordarshan, took the arbitrary decision to place a news-programme, The World This Week—produced by Prannoy Roy’s NDTV—in the ‘A’ category for the purposes of sponsorship and in the ‘A Special’ category for spot buys. This decision, according to this year’s annual Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report, cost the exchequer a whopping Rs 3.52 crore.
[…]
The situation gets hairier for Basu since legal experts within the agency are almost unanimous that Basu’s employment with Star TV—which, incidentally, has a tie-up with NDTV—on what is said to be a whopping monthly salary of Rs 15 lakh only three days after he left government service, establishes the fact that he was a beneficiary.
Outlook, 22nd Sep 1997: “How Zee Is Shooting Star: Lobbyists have a field day as Subhash Chandra guns for partner Murdoch’s expansion plans”
Surely, our culture and democracy couldn’t be so feeble. Hence the government seems to have adopted a more legalistic means to stop Star TV in its tracks. They’ve picked on Basu, once the government’s favourite bureaucrat, today the bad boy of babudom who’s sold out to Murdoch the marauder. Peer envy? Some elements in the bureaucracy agree. It is pointed out that when the DTH ban notification was issued, Basu, accompanied by Prannoy Roy and Rajat Sharma, had rushed to the prime minister who, in turn, had hauled up three senior bureaucrats—cabinet secretary T.S.R. Subramaniam, telecom secretary V.K. Gokak and the then information and broadcasting secretary N.P. Nawani—for issuing a sensitive order without consulting the PMO. That got the bureaucracy’s goat and the ministry of personnel and the CBI were asked to fix Basu for good.Indian Express, 20th Jan 1998: CBI case against Prannoy Roy
Every available missile has since been fired at the Star TV India CEO—the rule book, an ultimatum to remit office within 15 days, the threat to set the CBI on his trail. It did spread panic—Gary Davey flew down to Delhi twice, Murdoch flew into Hong Kong to take stock and Star’s ally, Prannoy Roy’s NDTV, faced the prospect of being sucked into the vortex of the raging controversy—but, as things stand, Basu is still in the saddle and fighting. The case against him is that as a former DD chief, he is privy to the national broadcaster’s long-term plans. But one has to be spectacularly gullible to swallow that line: the only secrets that DD can possibly yield for the benefit of its rivals would be about how not to run a network. It is, after all, a badly-managed outfit whose policies have less to do with market realities and its public service broadcasting aims than with the whims of its political bosses in Shastri Bhavan.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has filed a case of criminal conspiracy against New Delhi Television (NDTV) managing director Prannoy Roy, former Director General of Doordarshan and present Chief Executive Officer of Star TV R Basu and and five other top officials of Doordarshan. The First Information Report (FIR) filed on the basis of “source information”‘ says that the undue favour granted to Prannoy Roy had led to a loss of approximately Rs five crore to Doordarshan.The case filed was specific. Not much is known about the fate of the CBI case. While the Indian Express report says that a case was indeed filed against Prannoy Roy, NDTV’s public offering prospectus in 2004 seemingly falsifies this information and implies that there was no FIR or no case was filed against NDTV or Roy:
The FIR filed in the court of Special CBI judge Ajit Bharihoke alleges that the officials of Doordarshan had “entered into a criminal conspiracy at New Delhi during 1990-1996 with Prannoy Roy with a view to cause favour by abusing their official position.”
According to the CBI charge-sheet, DD suffered a loss of over Rs 3.52 crore due to the “undue favours” shown to NDTV as its programme The World This Week (TWTW) was put in `A’ category instead of `special A’ category.
The Company and its promoters have also been named in an First Information Report (FIR) filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in January 1998 against certain DD officials in relation to certain violations of rules by DD officials pertaining to certain programmes produced by the Company for telecast by DD. Till date, no case has been instituted against the Company based on the investigation carried out pursuant to the FIR.In March 1998, Smt Sushma Swaraj took over as Information & Broadcasting Minister in AB Vajpayee’s cabinet. This was what was last heard.
Indian Express, 9th July 1998: Mandarins’ Murdoch mission likely to end up in smoke
Another wrongstreet the government is getting into is going after Murdoch through Prannoy Roy and R Basu. Sushma Swaraj has said that she is letting loose the CBI to look into the undue benefits provided to NDTV by DD when he used to provide the state network with programming. An issue that has been simmering for the past couple of years but has got nowhere. It’s about time, the authorities stop their tomfoolery and get over their Murdoch fixation.Here’s some kind of “list of events” related to DD from 1998: Doordarshan: The Year That Was! It seems to have been in memory as late as 2003, as shown in this gossip article at Rediff from March 2003:
Information & Broadcast Ministry, Doordarshan and discretion[Editor: The whole saga turns up several interesting points. Who bailed Prannoy Roy and NDTV out? Needle of suspicion points at the following people in the NDA Government: AB Vajpayee, PM, Brajesh Mishra, Cabinet Secretary, LK Advani, Home Minister and Sushma Swaraj, Information & Broadcast Minister. The decision could have been a consensual one driven by Brajesh Mishra. One does notice that Brajesh finds himself in NDTV whenever he wants. AB Vajpayee to NDTV was always the good man in a bad party. NDTV's coverage on Smt Swaraj is markedly different from its coverage of Shri Narendra Modi. Before 2009 elections, LK Advani was specially awarded by NDTV for life time achievement (for what? babri mosque structure demolition?
Despite the recent public focus on the misuse of ministerial discretion, nothing seems to have changed. A case in point is the information and broadcasting ministry.
In the recent past, Doordarshan has turned many including Prannoy Roy to Vinod Dua into millionaires. And many more constantly knock at its doors for make-me-rich-overnight contracts, especially where commissioned programmes are concerned.
).Progressively in Indian media, journalism of courage has by and large been buried. Prannoy James Roy, son of English Mother and Bengali father has done rather well by networking with the powerful and the corrupt. He is a member of the CFR. He is a co-brother of Prakash Karat, Marxist Communist Party, General Secretary who by the way is also a bible expert and who was guided by liberation theologian, Reverend Duncan Forester for scholarship to Edinburgh University(Wikipedia wont tell you this.
) Prannoy is Suzanne (aka Arundati) Roy's cousin. By and large and not surprisingly NDTV has been faithful to red and islamist networks whose agenda, NDTV champions. Discourse subversion by the likes of NDTV has high costs and is not understood by many. One shudders to think to what compromises, NDTV and the Roys would have done to sustain their almost perpetually loss-making entity. Continuous survival of a continually loss making NDTV is a financial miracle in itself that calls for scrutiny.Further, success through corruption sets a very wrong example to the society. Its not a coincidence that Rajdeep Sardesai, Raghav Behl and others have sought to emulate Prannoy Roy Model of Corruption and Deceit journalism. It is said old habits die hard. NDTV was again in the news for corruption. Sunday Guardian highlighted how NDTV avoids Taxes and of financial chicanery with ICICI bank. NDTV decided to brazen it out and tried intimidating tactics with Sunday Guardian. And well, interview appearances, 'awards' for Chanda Kochchar, 'Life time Achievement' for KV Kamath
and award to ICICI have nothing to do with quid pro quo?Fredrick Hayek's rule on people violating ossified rules in India kind of scarcity environment has been proffered at times to justify corruption. That defence does not hold in cases similar to prannoy roy's CBI case where the goal is to defraud the tax-payer and criminal conspiracy is involved. It might be worthwhile for intrepid RTI -waalas to cull out facts on Prannoy Roy's CBI case. Dr. Swamy suggests innovative ways to prosecute the corrupt. These approaches are likely to work when the judiciary is fair. Judiciary, post KG Balakrishnan seems different and presents a window of opportunity to tame corruption such as NDTV's]
Related:
- Dr Swamy on Corporate Corruption
- Corrupt Media continues to suck in its 2G scam coverage
- Sequence of events and Media’s strange reluctance to cover 2G scam
- NDTV Barkha Dutt and her Hate Mobsters Cross the Line, Manifest Dastardly Behavior
- Tweet Twisting. Old Media Habits Die Hard. Prannoy Roy School of Deceit Journalism is Dead
- Barkhagate: When Niira Radia got us a peep into secret workings of corrupt media
- NDTV’s Sickular News Model: Selective Censorship
- Mind-boggling support for Terror Courier Service of Binayak Sen – Why?
- No Justice for Dead and Mute Anil Kumar. Child Victim of Christian Sexual Abuse – Indian Big Media’s sickular coverage
(Zoom Indian Media)
------------------------------------------------------ कोई भी मूल्य एवं संस्कृति तब तक जीवित नहीं रह सकती जब तक वह आचरण में नहीं है.
No comments:
Post a Comment