Central govt is the one which keeps a vigil over what happens in the country. India is a vast country and it becomes a tough job in true sense. Nevertheless, steps taken on the major issues can tell much about the running Govt.
We can, through follwing fews issues, see one of the incapable and negative govts India ever had:
1. In state called Maharashtra, Raj Thackeray induces his followers to throw the NORTH INDIANS violently coz they eat up all the employment resources available in Maharashtra and bla bla.
2. In two states Orrisa and Karnataka, violence triggers due to religious reasons.
3. In the north of Bengal, giving their violance a final look people of some particular group have trying to make a new state GORKHALAND. In their own interests new signboards, new plates on vehicles mentioning GL (Gorkhaland), traditional dresses in the colleges, and so on have been started.
There are many more incidents (ya coz govt doesn't take it as a challenge) which u can find in the country where the role of the central Govt. has been questionable.
*In the first instance, Govt. was treating the whole issue like it were a matter in Lanka or Bangladesh. Some allies have resigned in a Lalu-Nitish led politics and these guys will try to negotiate it in coming elections. Our govt was a spectator.... .... it does not take that every Indian has right to live and work in any part of the country... and what Raj Thackeray was doing is right.
*Almost in same time the second incident happened following anti-religious remarks by christians towards Hindu Gods/Goddesses in one state and due to the inhumane murder of a Hindu saint in other. The govt. was very much eager to take action (however only after being scolded by Italian and other east Asian govts.) against the state govts. coz they were led by non-UPA allies. Suprisingly, these riots were not led by any group, but all were public agitations. Central Govt tried to give it a political form and negotiated well.
*Gorkhaland case seems a play for the govt. It looks like a spectator again. If some thousand people come and demand for a new state, then the day will come that there will be some new countries in our neighbouring too. Instead of taking a lead and solve the matter it is waiting for the elections to come and want to encash the situations like this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
कोई भी मूल्य एवं संस्कृति तब तक जीवित नहीं रह सकती जब तक वह आचरण में नहीं है.
We can, through follwing fews issues, see one of the incapable and negative govts India ever had:
1. In state called Maharashtra, Raj Thackeray induces his followers to throw the NORTH INDIANS violently coz they eat up all the employment resources available in Maharashtra and bla bla.
2. In two states Orrisa and Karnataka, violence triggers due to religious reasons.
3. In the north of Bengal, giving their violance a final look people of some particular group have trying to make a new state GORKHALAND. In their own interests new signboards, new plates on vehicles mentioning GL (Gorkhaland), traditional dresses in the colleges, and so on have been started.
There are many more incidents (ya coz govt doesn't take it as a challenge) which u can find in the country where the role of the central Govt. has been questionable.
*In the first instance, Govt. was treating the whole issue like it were a matter in Lanka or Bangladesh. Some allies have resigned in a Lalu-Nitish led politics and these guys will try to negotiate it in coming elections. Our govt was a spectator.... .... it does not take that every Indian has right to live and work in any part of the country... and what Raj Thackeray was doing is right.
*Almost in same time the second incident happened following anti-religious remarks by christians towards Hindu Gods/Goddesses in one state and due to the inhumane murder of a Hindu saint in other. The govt. was very much eager to take action (however only after being scolded by Italian and other east Asian govts.) against the state govts. coz they were led by non-UPA allies. Suprisingly, these riots were not led by any group, but all were public agitations. Central Govt tried to give it a political form and negotiated well.
*Gorkhaland case seems a play for the govt. It looks like a spectator again. If some thousand people come and demand for a new state, then the day will come that there will be some new countries in our neighbouring too. Instead of taking a lead and solve the matter it is waiting for the elections to come and want to encash the situations like this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
कोई भी मूल्य एवं संस्कृति तब तक जीवित नहीं रह सकती जब तक वह आचरण में नहीं है.
100% सही विशलेषण किया है आपने जब जब कांग्रेस का सरकार आया है सरकारी कर्मचारी को काग्रेस सरकार घरेलु नौकर की तरह इस्तेमाल करता है। कांग्रेस अपने शासने काल में आतंकवादीयों का कुछ उखार नही सका तो ध्यान बटाने के लिये हिन्दु आंतकवाद का हल्ला मचाना सुरु कर दिया।
ReplyDeleteबधाई इस लेख के लिये
Such things are true in UPA II too....its really sad that people dont understand.
Delete